7 Plus Hypocrisies of the LGBT- Letting Go of Biological Truth activists
Jason Salamone | July 16, 2017
(barbwire.com) – LGBT – Letting Go of Biological Truth / Letting Go of Biblical Truth.
The Rainbow Jihad hypocrisy alert….
(1.) They bring their activism about…to our doors publicly and then claim we are forcing our beliefs on them.
(2.) They try to indoctrinate other people’s children while accusing Christians of doing the same, when most Christians primarily focus on sharing their faith and values with only their own children.
(3.) They accuse Christians of trying to establish a theocracy, but believe bakery cake makers should be forced to participate in events they don’t agree with.
(4.) They continue to accuse Christians of trying to establish a theocracy, but ignore the fact that nobody was forcing them to worship Christ before, during, or after the rulings of Obergefell v. Hodges or even before Lawrence vs Texas.
(5.) They cloak their activism under the guise of emotionally manipulative terms like “countering discrimination” or “countering bullying,” when there is absolutely no reason or need to promote their… habits, let alone any kind of bedroom habits, publicly in order to be against such things. Emphasis added
(6.) They constantly argue for and scream the word “equality” over and over again as an emotionally manipulative rallying cry, all while pushing the idea of same sex couples raising children, which deliberately and intentionally denies children any chance at experiencing being raised by either the loving motherhood only women can provide or the loving fatherhood only men can provide, and as a result promoting family structure inequality at the expense of a child’s basic steadfast needs.
About Same Sex Couples Adopting Children:
The most recent reports when it came to adoption stats and data came out in 2010, and some more recent than that…
They conclude that for every child that needed to be adopted there were 36 couples considering adoption. There should absolutely be no reason at all why children should be placed in a home that, for the lifetime of the relationship, DELIBERATELY and INTENTIONALLY denies them any chance at experiencing loving motherhood that only a woman can provide or loving fatherhood that only a man can provide. It’s one thing if children are raised in such situations by accident (single parents as a result of a divorce or death of a parent). Again, these are accidental situations, where the child may still have a chance at family structure equality. But there is nothing loving at all about family structure inequality…purposefully throwing children into an inherently designed sex segregated family structure.
Notice the Left, and especially homosexual activists, never make the important distinction between accidental and purposeful/intentional situations? Notice how they point to examples of accidental problems that happen when it comes to family structure to justify their worldview and agenda rather than point to existing examples of loving stable homes where both the mother and father are present? Think about what this actual reveals about their worldview.
“Persons caught up in homosexual practice (same sex couples) often use the argument that same-sex attraction is their natural inclination and since their attraction is — in their view — “natural,” they believe that same-sex relationships are “moral” and therefore must be affirmed by government. However, it is also natural that their sexual relationships are inherently sterile and barren. Whereas sterility in a man-woman relationship is a sign of some defect or disorder, sterility in a homosexual relationship is the way it is intended to be. Sterility is the natural condition of homosexual acts. Therefore, they should not violate their natural design by appropriating children.” – Laurie Higgins
(7.) Their activism seeks to oppress and ban talk therapy dealing with emotional issues of those with unwanted same sex attraction focused on issues of temperament and healing of relationships and improving family dynamics. At the same time, they are perfectly fine with children, teens, and adults being injected with potentially harmful hormone blockers and having their perfectly functioning genitalia and other body parts mutilated and chopped off.
This is why the homosexual activist (LGBT – Letting Go of Biological Truth) lobby should be called “modern day slave owners.” The position and stance they hold is that they don’t want anybody who has unwanted same sex attraction to have the choice to leave their plantation they deceptively like to call “gay.” No freedom to choose, no right to exercise self-determination, no individual liberty. They are constantly attempting to use the force of government to try and ban therapy (and have had much success) in order to prevent those unhappy with their same-sex attractions from living in accordance with their ideals, reaching their goals, and finding peace within themselves. They want to stop persons really of any age from simply talking to and be treated by licensed therapists if they want to address their romantic and sexual inclinations in ways that align with their faith, values, morals, and life goals. This slave owner-like “you must stay on the “gay” plantation or else” view and totalitarian efforts should concern anybody who believes in the freedom, self-determination, real choice, and liberty.
And whenever a conference or meeting happens between those who have actually left their plantation, the modern day plantation owners that is the homosexual activist lobby likes to mobilize their lynchmobs with the intent to shut down and censor.
It’s all hypocrisy and projection at its highest level.
What about Homosexual Activist groups in general?…
The homosex (LGBT- Letting Go of Biological Truth) activist lobby/special interest group called Human Rights Campaign (HRC) (co-founded and started by pedophile Terry Bean) unveiled a $26 million plan to influence the 2018 elections. Remember, one doesn’t have to push their… bedroom habits in order to be against actual discrimination and against any kind of bullying. They always use euphemistic language used to simply emotionally manipulate. It’s what they do.
So please ask yourselves 3 questions:
(1.) Why does there exist lobby/special interest activist groups that advocate for their bedroom habits publicly?
(2.) Keeping in mind that pro family groups only exist as a reaction to them, how is it possible that a lobby/special interest group like HRC that ultimately advocates for their private bedroom habits publicly, has or is able to get $26 million dollars to throw around at whatever they want?
(3.) Who are the ones donating or giving money to special interest/lobby groups that promote and push bedroom habits publicly? Do they understand that they are giving money to a special interest group that is ultimately advocating publicly for what they even admit is a private bedroom matter? Why waste your money on that?
If we stop and really think about it, how many more children would be either sexually abused and/or mentally mind raped by the Left, and especially by the homosexual activist lobby and the abortion lobby, if there didn’t exist the voice and the push back from Biblical Christians and the Social Conservative movement? (rhetorical) It would be mind numbing and disgusting to think about how many more children and their emotional, mental, physical, and spiritual well-being would be compromised, subverted, and destroyed by the Left. This is not to say that there aren’t hypocrites and morally bankrupt people within Christianity or Social Conservatives that have been guilty of abusing children in such a way, but the Left is the only segment of the population who as a public political movement engages in such ideas either overtly or through Marxist ideological subversion tactics.
A perfect example is this Teen Vogue controversy. Why does a Leftist run publication Teen Vogue whose editorial director is a homosexual activist himself, get away with sharing information to 11-17 year old children and teens, when if an adult neighbor went up to another neighbor’s 14 year old daughter and started sharing the same information to her or him would be met with strict rebuke by that 14 year old’s parent? How is it different if and when Teen Vogue engages in the same creepy behavior with children and other people’s children? If you ever come across anybody who thinks that that Teen Vogue article is okay, ask them if they have children or to imagine if they have children and what would they do if some random adult just went up to their children and started spewing to them the wonders of anal sex and how to do it? Then ask them how is it different when Teen Vogue thinks or believes they have the right to do the same thing with other people’s children???
Also, here’s another Lefty online publication (Guardian) promoting the bad as something good, yet again, and just further proves my point here that while there exists fallen and corrupt people on the right, it is only the Left that is actively promoting corruption publicly and culturally as a collective group think political movement not caring about what influence it may have on children…
When the Left asks us rhetorically why we Christians and Conservatives are so obsessed with all things having to do with sex, they only ask this question only as a rhetorical weapon to silence us. They are simply projecting. …Christians and Social Conservatives are not the ones writing and publishing articles trying to normalize, promote, and celebrate every sex act and bedroom habit as all being the same to children and teens publicly. The Left are the only ones that give public advocacy voices to actual pedophiles and entertain the idea that the sickness of social stigma on pedophiles may be a worse sickness than pedophilia itself, which follows the exact way they’ve been able to normalized homosexual practice in our culture (a.k.a mind rape). The social conservative movement only came about as a response and reaction to the Leftist manufactured sexual revolution launched by child abuse facilitator, sado-masochist, and junk science sexology provocateur Alfred Kinsey (Google Alfred Kinsey Children of Table 34).
And since the Left won’t let up on advocating their private bedroom matters publicly, and even worse, attempt to do so by also targeting children (and at best case scenario, may not intentionally target children, but show little to no concern or remorse as to whether or not it may influence children), this is exactly why the Social Conservative movement exists still today, solely as a response and reaction.
Why are their activist/special interest groups and lobbies like Human Rights Campaign (HRC) and the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) that care so much about wanting more people with same sex attraction to engage in homosexual sex and gender confusion when these people and groups can be spending that time and energy and money feeding the poor or helping homeless children, veterans, etc? Why do their bedroom habits, regardless of whether or not you think they are healthy or sinful or not, take priority over genuine human rights abuses that occur within our country as well as other countries?
For instance, here is just one of many examples I came across of a charitable organization that was started by seemingly just one woman that offers housing, food, addiction recovery, and employment skill building to homeless and disabled veterans. http://servniagara.org/ And also started the Kids Breaking Free Foundation, a not-for-profit that works with local social service and educational organizations to help children whose lives are stunted by drug addiction in their families. This is beyond admirable! This is what it is all about! Why donate or fund organizations that use or exploit victim narratives by hook or by crook just to help them advocate for their bedroom habits publicly? Imagine if a lobby group like HRC, and whatever homosexual activist lobby groups or paid bloggers one can think of, decided to focus on actual problems and human rights abuses?
Anyway, if GOD exists (and GOD does exist), then the right side of history belongs to authentic Biblical Christians and Social Conservatives. If GOD doesn’t exist, then there is really no meaning or purpose as to why we ought to do good things vs why we ought to not do bad things. We are just molecules in motion whose lives ends with a light switch and worm dirt. At the end of the day, each person on the Left will have guaranteed themselves the blood of innocent children on their hands one way or another that they will have to answer for. I hope and pray that they give this some genuine thought, consideration and reflection before their time comes to pass on this earth.
Because Social Conservatives mostly use a Biblical worldview and/or Natural Law (what is natural based on the nature of GOD) for discernment, they have been the most accurate predictors of societal and cultural behavior as far as what it means for both individuals and society and its short-term and long-term consequences. When the Left has been able to run amok legislatively and culturally with their Marxist ideas, the Social Conservative movement will be there to push back and to often spell out what the consequences are or will be. The Left will then respond with a “you’re crazy” shrug off or deny it. Then within due time, those consequences eventually occur. It may take 3 months or it may take 40 years, but what Social Conservative predict when it comes to the state of society and culture, almost always comes true.
There is no such thing as “live and let live” as long as there exists homosexual activist political lobbies and special interest groups. They will make you care about their bedroom habits publicly or else. And as long as all this is still reality in our culture and society, it only makes sense that we refer to them a Rainbow Jihad.